Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] In-Reply-To CFWS
- Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:42:06 -0500
- From: Jim <jep200404@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] In-Reply-To CFWS
- References: <43A8E7BB.9030507@example.com><20051221093555.34a2ad80.jep200404@example.com><d8fcc0800512211724p27914b0dh@example.com><8bf034130512220208jb74c4cct@example.com><877j9w3x9j.fsf@example.com><20051223120416.346039cc.godwin.stewart@example.com><871x042d32.fsf@example.com><8bf034130512230633x718ebe60l@example.com><20051227161043.733ca9fe.jep200404@example.com><20051227221736.9be8531a.godwin.stewart@example.com><20051227172647.7db10e36.jep200404@example.com><20051227233343.0838c2ee.godwin.stewart@example.com>
Hmmm. There sure is much in those headers. Thanks for showing the whole header. On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:33:43 +0100 Godwin Stewart <godwin.stewart@example.com> wrote: > On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:26:47 -0500, Jim <jep200404@example.com> wrote: > > > Perhaps Stephen J. Turnbull replied both privately to Godwin Stewart and > > publicly to the list, so that you saw the CFWS unmolested by the list, > > but everyone else saw only the reply that went through the list > > and had the CFWS stripped out. I would expect that Godwin Stewart > > actually got two replies from Stephen J. Turnbull. Perhaps Gmail > > seeming duplicates. > > Hmm... > > The mail I have here indicates that it originated from hikari.tlug.jp. So, > unless SJT has an account on that machine, it is list traffic. It also > contains the usual RFC2369 headers indicating that it is list traffic: > > Delivered-To: godwin.stewart@example.com ... > Received: from hikari.tlug.jp (hikari.tlug.jp [219.120.149.100]) > by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h19si4554972wxd.2005.12.23.04.49.19; > Fri, 23 Dec 2005 04:49:25 -0800 (PST) > Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com: best guess record for domain of tlug-request@example.com designates 219.120.149.100 as permitted sender) Cute. I've never seen a Received-SPF record before. Now that I look, I see a _few_ in old email. > Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=hikari.tlug.jp) > by hikari.tlug.jp with esmtp (Exim 4.54) > id 1EpmMD-0002LT-CF; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:49:13 +0900 > Received: (from slist@example.com) > by hikari.tlug.jp (8.12.11/8.12.6/Submit) id jBNCnDrO017207; > Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:49:13 +0900 (JST) > Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:49:06 +0900 (JST) It sure looks like that is the public reply. > Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:49:05 +0900 > In-Reply-To: <20051223120416.346039cc.godwin.stewart@example.com> (Godwin > Stewart's message of "Fri, 23 Dec 2005 12:04:16 +0100") Hmmm. Perhaps something between tlug and me gobbled the CFWS. Looking through old mail, I see that CFWS in email to me stopped some time ago. That would point to my ISP (or their feed). > Message-ID: <871x042d32.fsf@example.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] In-Reply-To CFWS
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- [tlug] Do You Skype.?
- From: Mark Sargent
- Re: [tlug] Skype
- From: Jim
- Re: [tlug] Skype
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] Skype
- From: Godwin Stewart
- Re: [tlug] Skype
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Skype
- From: Godwin Stewart
- Re: [tlug] Skype
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Skype
- From: Godwin Stewart
- Re: [tlug] In-Reply-To CFWS
- From: Jim
- Re: [tlug] In-Reply-To CFWS
- From: Godwin Stewart
- Re: [tlug] In-Reply-To CFWS
- From: Jim
- Re: [tlug] In-Reply-To CFWS
- From: Godwin Stewart
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] In-Reply-To CFWS
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Old dogs / new tricks
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] In-Reply-To CFWS
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] In-Reply-To CFWS
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links