Re: [tlug] wiki

[bruno raoult <bruno@example.com>]

Josh Glover wrote:
> On 17/11/06, Zev Blut <zb@example.com> wrote:
> 
>> More details we may want to consider:
>> (Some of these are from mails already in this thread)
>>
>> * Able to migrate wiki data to another wiki
>> * Ease of media uploads.
>> * used and supported by the community
> 
> MediaWiki does well on the latter two points. Can anyone speak to the
> first?

I would add a fourth criteria:

* easy to manage

I mean that a DB is much more difficult to manage than plain files...

If somebody volunteers to manage a [whatever database], this is fine.
If not, I prefer plain text DB wiki, where we can recover everything
without knowledge...

TLUG wiki will be small, and I don't see the point to have a database
behind it.

I may be wrong, of course.

br.

-- 
GPG Key: 653514E5 (http://www.raoult.com/gpg)
--
"You've got questions. We've got dancing paperclips."
   -- Microsoft

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature