
Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[tlug] Total operational cost... hard stats anywhere?
- Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:42:01 +0900
- From: Dave M G <dave@example.com>
- Subject: [tlug] Total operational cost... hard stats anywhere?
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604)
TLUG,
Okay, well, I'm well into writing a follow up article to the "Windows Is
Free" article.
One of the things that many people wrote in about was the "total
operational cost" argument, which I'm sure many of you have heard
before. For those just tuning in, it's the claim that even though Linux
is free in terms of money, the learning curve associated with
transitioning takes so much time as to wipe out the benefits of the
savings.
I have a prepared counter-argument of how piracy makes that argument
irrelevant, but, along the way I was also thinking of making the claim
that there is almost no objective data to support this claim anyway. I
looked on the net and found all sorts of definitions of the term "total
operational cost", and lots anecdotal claims, but no supporting
research. One guy who emailed in claimed that switching to Linux would
take "hundreds of hours" of adjustment time, which is clearly a number
he just pulled out of his ass.
I can definitely claim that most people who offer this argument have
never really proved it to themselves or others. But that's different
from claiming that there is no proof at all.
Does anyone know of any kind of hard statistical research or data that
demonstrates any comparative metric for measuring "total operational
cost" for operating systems?
--
Dave M G
http://www.tlug.jp/wiki/User:Dave_M_G
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index