Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:23:13 +0900
- From: Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- References: <4AF70063.9060406@example.com> <eb6de36d0911081607l3e0d4887v6b3b9146d460b8db@example.com> <eb6de36d0911081609g28480f6co7cebc2ba08a4b520@example.com> <874op36gjj.fsf@example.com> <20091110014327.GC19475@example.com> <4AF8C76D.9000300@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On 2009-11-10 10:52 +0900 (Tue), Edward Middleton wrote: > It would be better if people trimmed appropriately and posted after > whatever they were responding to. Indeed, so let's tell them to do that. The suggestion that they simply not top-post, without mentioning trimming, will make things worse, not better, unless they happen to figure out through other means that they need to trim. cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> +81 90 7737 2974 Functional programming in all senses of the word: http://www.starling-software.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- [tlug] Computer parts people might have use for
- From: Dave M G
- Re: [tlug] Computer parts people might have use for
- From: nlin
- Re: [tlug] Computer parts people might have use for
- From: nlin
- Re: [tlug] Computer parts people might have use for
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: Edward Middleton
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links