Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:02:07 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- References: <4AF70063.9060406@example.com> <eb6de36d0911081607l3e0d4887v6b3b9146d460b8db@example.com> <eb6de36d0911081609g28480f6co7cebc2ba08a4b520@example.com> <874op36gjj.fsf@example.com> <20091110014327.GC19475@example.com> <4AF8C76D.9000300@example.com> <20091110032313.GE19475@example.com>
Curt Sampson writes: > Indeed, so let's tell them to do that. The suggestion that they simply > not top-post, without mentioning trimming, will make things worse, not > better, My assumption is that people who post to this list just need a reminder. If they need more than that, no big deal. Not if it only happens once, anyway.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: Curt Sampson
- References:
- [tlug] Computer parts people might have use for
- From: Dave M G
- Re: [tlug] Computer parts people might have use for
- From: nlin
- Re: [tlug] Computer parts people might have use for
- From: nlin
- Re: [tlug] Computer parts people might have use for
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: Edward Middleton
- Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: Curt Sampson
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links