Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Solarized Colour Scheme
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 08:00:22 +0200
- From: Christian Horn <chorn@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Solarized Colour Scheme
- References: <20180915052326.rzjg4hrbvirmdg7t@monotonic.cynic.net> <20180915101614.GA29771@wismut> <20180918044226.zsxwktgp7viyl25v@iambic.cynic.net> <20180918054823.mb5gf3zma2fbdjex@iambic.cynic.net>
- User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 02:48:23PM +0900, Curt Sampson wrote: > Oh my. I just realized that xterm, at least the version that comes > with Debian 9, supports 256-colors out of the box. It's just that, for > some reason, when I start an xterm, it comes up with `TERM=xterm` in > the environment, rather than `TERM=xterm-256color`. > > Any thoughts on what could be causing this or how to fix it? I have > confirmed that the environment that launches xterm has no `TERM` > variable in its environment. Same here on Fedora. My guess is that it's just the more widely known setting, so setting TERM or xterm is playing it safe. Chris
- References:
- [tlug] Solarized Colour Scheme
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] Solarized Colour Scheme
- From: Jens John
- Re: [tlug] Solarized Colour Scheme
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] Solarized Colour Scheme
- From: Curt Sampson
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Solarized Colour Scheme
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Presentation for Next Technical Meeting
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Solarized Colour Scheme
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Solarized Colour Scheme
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links