Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]re: Compatibility
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: re: Compatibility
- From: turnbull@example.com (Stephen J. Turnbull)
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 96 19:45 JST
- In-Reply-To: <F0CE4031016B1673@example.com> (TMatsumu@example.com)
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Ted writes: Craig, Are you saying that Linux has only one driver, a postscript one, and gs is used to print the native PS output on other printers? No, Linux doesn't have *any* printer drivers. It has a spooler, lpr, which saves files to a spool directory and squirts them as binary to the printer port in the background. You can configure various scripts to call the necessary drivers as preprocessors. If so, that's not really the same meaning. Um, as long as it's transparent, what do you care if the driver is resident and takes up a 20kB DLL, or is a 1.4MB implementation of Ghostscript and gets called when you do a print? Sure, this takes a bit of extra arranging, and uses a little bit more resources, but what's wrong with that? It's not clear to me what you want. The point is that every program known to man and some known only to women and gods produces Postscript output as an option. That measn that if you have Ghostscript you can print to any printer that Ghostscript supports. Which is one hell of a long list. And don't forget you can make any kind of file that PPM or JPEG supports. Including GIF, TIFF, and fax. IMHO Steve
- Follow-Ups:
- re: Compatibility
- From: TMatsumu@example.com
- References:
- re: Compatibility
- From: TMatsumu@example.com
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: re: Compatibility
- Next by Date: JE
- Prev by thread: re: Compatibility
- Next by thread: re: Compatibility
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links