Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]RE: tlug: X resolution / color depth
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: RE: tlug: X resolution / color depth
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 09:32:42 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980320095042.3705b-100000@example.com>
- References: <199803200034.JAA00639@example.com><Pine.LNX.3.96.980320095042.3705b-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Stone <sstone@example.com> writes: >> > Everybody likes consistency. And of course, I'd like to see >> > them all adopt RPM. Not holding my breath on Slackware :-) >> What`s so good about RPM. I hate it. Scott> That's like saying that you hate cars and then taking a Scott> horse and buggy on the freeway (happens in PA sometimes...) No, it's completely different; you can use the Debian package manager, dpkg. I haven't looked at the internals of an RPM recently, but in cases where I wanted to alter a package I found it rather difficult as a casual user, since Red Hat spec files are written in a special language. Rather than bone up on it, I hosed my RHL installation by installing several packages (in particular X11R6.3 on Sparc) over the RH versions. ("Hosed" means I have no hope that RH will be able to do anything sensible when the Sparc Linux distribution finally gets upgraded; I'll have to reinstall from scratch. However it's working fine, thank you.) Debian on the other hand uses shell and Perl scripts. Not that they're necessarily easier, but the skills are more widespread. I've also found the quality of Debian contribs to be generally higher than RPMs, possibly because Debian makes a big deal of the "Debian Policy," and leaves the documentation in an accessible place (/usr/doc/debian* - the * can be a pain in the butt, sometimes.) This may also be true for Red Hat, I just didn't find it myself. Finally, my experience with Red Hat is old, but at that time I found that Debian did package dependencies and installation status better than Red Hat. I will say that Glint is slicker than dselect. Too much so; on the Sparc it's slow enough that "rpm -i `ls $RedHat/RPMS | fgrep $key`" is "user-friendly." I also found descending through several trees of package hierarchy to find what I wanted when Red Hat and I disagreed on the natural section for a package to be a pain in the butt. --------------------------------------------------------------- Next TLUG Meeting: 11 April Sat, Tokyo Station Yaesu gate 12:30 Featuring Tague Griffith of Netscape i18n talking on source code --------------------------------------------------------------- a word from the sponsor: TWICS - Japan's First Public-Access Internet System www.twics.com info@example.com Tel:03-3351-5977 Fax:03-3353-6096
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: tlug: X resolution / color depth
- From: Scott Stone <sstone@example.com>
- References:
- RE: tlug: X resolution / color depth
- From: Marcus Metzler <mocm@example.com>
- RE: tlug: X resolution / color depth
- From: Scott Stone <sstone@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: Net Day
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: X resolution / color depth
- Prev by thread: RE: tlug: X resolution / color depth
- Next by thread: RE: tlug: X resolution / color depth
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links