Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]tlug: Re: djb [was: ibm.net with LINUX (Red Hat)]
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: tlug: Re: djb [was: ibm.net with LINUX (Red Hat)]
- From: Rex Walters <rex@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 17:26:47 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <13775.58881.948878.867429@example.com>; from Stephen J. Turnbull on Tue, Aug 11, 1998 at 03:34:41PM +0900
- Mail-Followup-To: tlug@example.com
- References: <Pine.LNX.3.96LJ1.1b7.980725093814.1433A-100000@example.com> <199807251619.QAA00213@example.com> <13775.58881.948878.867429@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
On Tue, Aug 11, 1998 at 03:34:41PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > qmail's author unfortunately is enough of a blowhard that I don't know > that I trust his abilities, although some other people I know vouch > for his competence, as well as his confidence. Like some other highly intelligent people I know <eyes raised to the ceiling>, Dan Bernstein can be, uh, highly confident in his opinions. This quite often rubs people the wrong way. (Like the other folks I've mentioned, this is exacerbated by his extremely irritating tendency to be *right* so much of the time.) Regardless, it's a mistake to judge his code by his personality or which sides he takes in a debate. I'm no expert, so judge for yourself, but I've never come across more robust code in my career. It takes a while to grok his code because he rarely uses standard idioms and libraries (witness his "substdio" library) but the stuff he writes is secure and rock solid reliable. His approach to protocol design is equally dependable -- rather than develop protocols that work correctly only if everyone follows the spec to the T, he advocates designing protocols that work correctly even if implementors just follow examples and code to "common practice" (ref: http://pobox.com/~djb/proto/design.html). [I just remembered I never responded to your statement that you felt he took the wrong side on the CRLF debate, but I've got to say I still side with djb. Designing his way, IMHO, helps ensure things *work* in the real world where specs are rarely even read much less adhered to.] I would characterize djb's stuff as truly industrial grade software that requires a fair degree of expertise to use properly (or even understand). It isn't "consumer grade" code ready to be spoon fed to the masses, but, server-side, this seems appropriate. Sure he can be a pretty arrogant jerk at times, but man does he have some excellent software on koobera! Cheers, -- Rex -------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 18 September, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Meeting: October, Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate 12:30 -------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- Follow-Ups:
- tlug: Re: djb [was: ibm.net with LINUX (Red Hat)]
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: ibm.net with LINUX (Red Hat)
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: dual-pentium processors
- Next by Date: tlug: mounting removeable media
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: ibm.net with LINUX (Red Hat)
- Next by thread: tlug: Re: djb [was: ibm.net with LINUX (Red Hat)]
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links