Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]tlug: Re: djb [was: ibm.net with LINUX (Red Hat)]
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: tlug: Re: djb [was: ibm.net with LINUX (Red Hat)]
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 17:59:06 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <19980811172647.30111@example.com>
- References: <Pine.LNX.3.96LJ1.1b7.980725093814.1433A-100000@example.com><199807251619.QAA00213@example.com><13775.58881.948878.867429@example.com><19980811172647.30111@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
>>>>> "Rex" == Rex Walters <rex@example.com> writes: Rex> On Tue, Aug 11, 1998 at 03:34:41PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull Rex> wrote: >> qmail's author unfortunately is enough of a blowhard that I >> don't know that I trust his abilities, although some other >> people I know vouch for his competence, as well as his >> confidence. Rex> Like some other highly intelligent people I know <eyes raised Rex> to the ceiling> Why are you looking at me?[1] Rex> Regardless, it's a mistake to judge his code by his Rex> personality or which sides he takes in a debate. I'm no Rex> expert, so judge for yourself, but I've never come across Rex> more robust code in my career. It takes a while to grok his Rex> code because he rarely uses standard idioms and libraries Rex> (witness his "substdio" library) but the stuff he writes is Rex> secure and rock solid reliable. When you don't have time to grok code (read "lazy" if you want), and the code doesn't use standard idioms, reliability is hard to judge. "It's my code so it's good" doesn't build confidence until I have independent corroboration.... Rex> His approach to protocol design is equally dependable -- Rex> rather than develop protocols that work correctly only if Rex> everyone follows the spec to the T, he advocates designing Rex> protocols that work correctly even if implementors just Rex> follow examples and code to "common practice" (ref: Rex> http://pobox.com/~djb/proto/design.html). Problem with that approach is that protocols interact, and there are legacy systems issues as well. 'Nuff said, until I've read the reference you've so thoughtfully provided. (I don't use search engines anymore, I just read tlug ;-) Footnotes: [1] Just couldn't resist! -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +1 (298) 53-5091 -------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 18 September, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Meeting: October, Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate 12:30 -------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: Re: djb [was: ibm.net with LINUX (Red Hat)]
- From: Karl-Max Wagner <karlmax@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: ibm.net with LINUX (Red Hat)
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- tlug: Re: djb [was: ibm.net with LINUX (Red Hat)]
- From: Rex Walters <rex@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Let's Note + TLJ2.0 (Re: tlug: gratitude)
- Next by Date: tlug: Re: The whole affair
- Prev by thread: tlug: Re: djb [was: ibm.net with LINUX (Red Hat)]
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: Re: djb [was: ibm.net with LINUX (Red Hat)]
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links