Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [Lingo] Workflow vs. Jobflow
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 10:55:48 +0900
- From: David Blomberg <dblomber@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [Lingo] Workflow vs. Jobflow
- References: <CACvCDgbv1Y4HPKCXAgn-MheEZpeg0qJM9xAW61fnZgckGNm0Fw@mail.gmail.com> <87fwazqmbc.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
On 5/17/12 4:49 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:Funny I have always used workflow to describe how a project is done, while jobflow comes up in how smaller portions of a project (tasks) are done. I have never used it in context as to the rate of work.... I am starting to wonder if this word may have a regional meaning change...."Workflow" means "how a task is done", while "jobflow" would almost certain mean "rate at which a series of tasks is done."-- Thank You David Blomberg This message is classified Cisco Confidential
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Lingo] Workflow vs. Jobflow
- From: Nguyễn Vũ Hưng
- Re: [Lingo] Workflow vs. Jobflow
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- [Lingo] Workflow vs. Jobflow
- From: Nguyễn Vũ Hưng
- [Lingo] Workflow vs. Jobflow
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [Lingo] Which kanji is correct?
- Next by Date: Re: [Lingo] Workflow vs. Jobflow
- Previous by thread: Re: [Lingo] Workflow vs. Jobflow
- Next by thread: Re: [Lingo] Workflow vs. Jobflow
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links