Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- From: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:40:06 +0200
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Delivered-To: tlug@example.com
- In-Reply-To: <15232.38117.177015.527416@example.com>
- List-Help: <mailto:tlug-request@example.comsubject=help>
- List-Post: <mailto:tlug@example.com>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:tlug-request@example.comsubject=subscribe>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tlug-request@example.comsubject=unsubscribe>
- Mail-Followup-To: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>, tlug@example.com
- Old-Return-Path: <ranma@example.com>
- References: <F124FRaqbC8wSA1XvpF000090ae@example.com> <15227.39771.9000.307909@example.com> <3B7BA029.80DFE032@example.com> <15228.32466.470584.418429@example.com> <20010817151011.F11053@example.com> <15229.63895.947565.503292@example.com> <20010818141715.A31945@example.com> <15232.38117.177015.527416@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <qiTOV.A.UuG.vIgg7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- Sender: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > I'm pretty sure that was implemented in my ancient AMI controller; > allegedly you could transfer a file from one drive to another with a > single (fairly complex) command. Interesting. Which Filesystem did that one support for that ? > Whether linux drivers would do that I don't know. AFAIK no. > It would certainly be useful in applications like > writing CD-Rs etc. Another funny thing you can do with scsi is connect the other end of the bus to a second scsi controller (with a differnt scsi id) in a different host, so both hosts can share cdroms and cd writers. And I think I remember there at least was an option to support tcp/ip over scsi some time ago. (^_^) Have not seen that one in my recent linux kernels though, but I did not really look for it... -- Tobias PGP-Key: 0x9AC7E0BC When one burns one's bridges, what a very nice fire it makes. -- Dylan Thomas
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- From: "Jean-Christian Imbeault" <jean_christian@example.com>
- IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- From: "A.Sajjad Zaidi" <sajjad@example.com>
- Re: IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- From: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>
- Re: IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- From: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>
- Re: IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Open Source Symposium in September, 2001.
- Next by Date: Re: IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- Prev by thread: Re: IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- Next by thread: Re: IDE vs SCSI for RAID
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links