Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Munging Email Addresses
- Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:17:31 +0900
- From: Josh Glover <jmglov@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Munging Email Addresses
- References: <op.s1uzh5034j0um6@example.com> <43A36D11.5040404@example.com> <d8fcc0800512161827v3bc25575m@example.com> <20051216215050.20874344.jep200404@example.com> <d8fcc0800512161906n6217a68bx@example.com> <87hd98dy5e.fsf@example.com>
On 17/12/05, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen@example.com> wrote: > >>>>> "Josh" == Josh Glover <jmglov@example.com> writes: > > Josh> [Security through illegibility] is a great idea, IMO. What > Josh> do other people think? > > Since you asked ... [...] > It simply doesn't satisfy the needs of people worried about their > future employability. Nor is it intended to be. The obscurity is simply supposed to be a deterrent for spam haruvas, and it seems that spam haruvas do not generally use OCR. Why should they, when the Internet is full of unobscured addresses. Cheers, Josh
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Munging Email Addresses
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- [tlug] Should we stop password protecting the TLUG archives?
- From: Zev Blut
- Re: [tlug] Should we stop password protecting the TLUG archives?
- From: bruno raoult
- Re: [tlug] Should we stop password protecting the TLUG archives?
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] Munging Email Addresses
- From: Jim
- Re: [tlug] Munging Email Addresses
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] Munging Email Addresses
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Should we stop password protecting the TLUG archives?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Should we stop password protecting the TLUG archives?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Munging Email Addresses
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Munging Email Addresses
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links