Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?

[Edward Middleton <emiddleton@example.com>]

Curt Sampson wrote:
> Looking back at the archives of this list to the beginning of
> November, I see three top-posted messages, and eight non-top-posted ones
> where the included text was significantly larger than the new text, and
> much of the text was quite clearly unnecessary to understand the message
> (two or three of these were just straight bottom-posts).
>   

No arguments here, bottom posting is irritating.  Maybe directing this
at the appropriate bottom-posters might be more productive.

Edward