Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: rhetorical form [was: Re: [Lingo] you have got to be kidding]
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:42:27 +0900
- From: "Josh Glover" <jmglov@example.com>
- Subject: Re: rhetorical form [was: Re: [Lingo] you have got to be kidding]
- References: <8572e260706251822m70b91ddbkdaa1898076040d1@mail.gmail.com> <f118b8b90706251903qefe8d4ep679b83c927f0b8cb@mail.gmail.com> <20070626041558.GD3493@inferi.kami.home> <d8fcc0800706252137v52964fcvc4be6a249c814e6b@mail.gmail.com> <20070626051647.GA3982@inferi.kami.home>
On 26/06/07, Mattia Dongili <malattia@example.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 01:37:59PM +0900, Josh Glover wrote:
> 'cept you cannot use 「ようです」 here.
/me kindly asks why
「冗談のようです」 means "seems like it is a joke", and it is just not frequently used in conjunction with 冗談.
Maybe if someone says 「この俺様は外人が大嫌いだぞ!」 in a drunken fit, you could later ask your mate, 「あれは本当のことだった?」 and maybe get 「いや、冗談のようだった」 as a response. But chances are your mate would just say, 「いや、冗談だったかも。。」
But in this context, it feels fairly artificial.
why not -ね? It give me the impression that the -ね form implies a "right?/aren't you?" that gives the idea of the answer I expect.
「ね」 is described this way in introductory grammar textbooks, but it is not that strong. Really, it is used to request agreement from your conversation partner, but you would not ever use it to ask a *real* question.
e.g. this is a common use of 「ね」:
マッチヤ:今日はいい天気ですね。 太郎:ですよね。
But if you were really asking for an answer to "aren't you? / isn't it?", you need to use a stronger question particle:
マッチヤ:今日はいい天気ですか。 太郎:ま、天気予報によると、雨が降るかもしれません。
-- Cheers, Josh
- References:
- [Lingo] you have got to be kidding
- From: Pietro Zuco
- Re: [Lingo] you have got to be kidding
- From: Keith Bawden
- rhetorical form [was: Re: [Lingo] you have got to be kidding]
- From: Mattia Dongili
- Re: rhetorical form [was: Re: [Lingo] you have got to be kidding]
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: rhetorical form [was: Re: [Lingo] you have got to be kidding]
- From: Mattia Dongili
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: rhetorical form [was: Re: [Lingo] you have got to be kidding]
- Next by Date: RE: [Lingo] you have got to be kidding
- Previous by thread: Re: rhetorical form [was: Re: [Lingo] you have got to be kidding]
- Next by thread: Re: [Lingo] you have got to be kidding
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links