Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:04:42 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- References: <874op36gjj.fsf@example.com> <4AF8C76D.9000300@example.com> <20091110032313.GE19475@example.com> <87tyx3dlbk.fsf@example.com> <20091110051706.GG19475@example.com> <87skcmevme.fsf@example.com> <20091110074710.GL19475@example.com> <4AF933BA.6080800@example.com> <a690a4c90911100238u24e48d5frc61805fad9b4fbab@example.com> <20091110120458.GP19475@example.com> <4fefd6340911101613u36561b64t3c59bbf8c7d7b57b@example.com>
Gernot Hassenpflug writes: > But is there a name (or token <g>) for such a "proper" style? "Netiquette-conforming." There was a day when it was so common, and accepted by consensus, that it didn't need a name. But here we are on www.saruyama.biz, aka, the humor-impaired think that Brad is serious: http://www.templetons.com/brad/emily.html > Or is it simply referred to via a RFC number? Netiquette is an informal user-side protocol, not a defined wire format. It should not have an RFC number, so no real IETF grok knows what it is.[1] Nevertheless, it's RFC 1855: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Footnotes: [1] I found it only by accident, Goggling for "netiquette faq".
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Computer parts people might have use for
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: Edward Middleton
- Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: Edward Middleton
- Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: Michael Bitker
- Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- From: Gernot Hassenpflug
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] Posting Style Terminology: interleaved-posting and inline-posting (was Re: Better to have "bottom-posted"?)
- Next by Date: [tlug] eskimo.com down ?
- Previous by thread: [tlug] Posting Style Terminology: interleaved-posting and inline-posting (was Re: Better to have "bottom-posted"?)
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Better to have "bottom-posted"?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links